Friday, January 15, 2016

A bear market in stocks will be over before you know it

The S&P 500’s decline since last June already is more than half the length of an average bear market



CHAPEL HILL, N.C. (MarketWatch) — Bear markets don’t have to be as scary as you think.
That’s because, by the time you know for sure that you’re in one, there are decent odds that it’s close to being over.
This is important to keep in mind, not only because bear markets are an inevitable feature of the market landscape. It’s especially timely today, since some market averages (the Russell 2000 RUT, -1.84% for example) are already in bear market territory — as defined by a decline of at least 20% — even though the broader market averages are still above that threshold.
TimeRussell 2000 IndexMar 15May 15Jul 15Sep 15Nov 15Jan 16
US:RUT
1,0001,1001,2001,3009001,400
Take the stock market’s recent decline, which began last June 23, the day that market benchmarks such as the S&P 500 SPX, -1.74%  hit their all-time high. That was 206 calendar days ago, which — as you can see from the chart above — is more than half the length of the average bear market of the past century. (I was able to calculate this average courtesy of a bear-market calendar maintained by Ned Davis Research, which counts 35 bear markets since 1900; their average length is 403 days.)
Of course, we’re not yet in a bear market. If, and when, the S&P 500 drops to 20% below the June high, even more time will have transpired.
This is precisely what happened in 2011, the year of the last bear market in the U.S. The early-October day when the S&P 500 fell to 20% below its late-April high turned out to be the day that bear market breathed its last gasp.
Not all bear markets work out this neatly, needless to say. But, not infrequently, a bear-market declaration often amounts to little more than closing the barn door after the horses have left.
We should all be asking: What were Wall Street’s latter-day bears saying last June, when the market was at an all-time high?
The answer is that bears were few and far between. On the contrary, bullishness was at close to extreme levels.
None of this is to minimize the pain and suffering caused by bear-market losses. But there should be at least some solace in knowing that, even if it is eventually determined that a bear market began last June, if it’s no worse than average it’s already more than half over.

Royal Bank of Scotland is warning their investors to sell virtually all their investments. Is this the beginning of the big selloff and a new depression?


Rural Debt and Drought Taskforce hears calls for Queensland Government to set up own bank

atsApp
A woman breaks down during a meeting of the Rural Debt and Drought Taskforce
Photo
A woman broke down in tears while speaking at the Rural Debt and Drought Taskforce in Ayr.
ABC News
Graziers struggling with debt in drought-declared North Queensland have lashed out and broken down in front of visiting politicians and economists.
The Rural Debt and Drought Taskforce met about 40 farmers in Ayr on Thursday to discuss what some called "criminal" and "disgraceful" behaviour by banks.
"You will starve — the whole country will starve" if governments do not "pull their heads in" and bail out the industry, one man warned.
Another said he was forced to eat sandwiches every day because he could not afford anything else and was offended by the catered spread at the meeting.
The gathering heard some lenders were devaluing properties across the region by up to 30 per cent, forcing graziers to pay higher interest rates because the loans were now considered higher risk.
Taskforce chairman and Mount Isa MP Rob Katter again argued the Queensland Government should set up its own bank to takeover loans from private lenders.
"These things are effective instruments. They keep industries going," he said.
Mr Katter said the risk would be low for taxpayers.
"There's no alternate use on these grazing properties out in the west and you've got some people who don't pay themselves wages but they're willing to stay out there paying taxes," he said.
"They just need a leg up after a few bad years."

'Kids know what's going on'

The ABC met one farming family struggling with drought in debt after eight years on their property near Ravenswood, east of Charter Towers.
"It [the drought and debt] affects everyone," mother of three Jess Rich said.
"The kids go out into the paddock and tell us about the day's duties and what they've seen and some days what they say is quite hard to take."
The Rich family supports calls for government support.
"Farmers aren't silly people. The money that they make is invested back into property and family. It's not spent on lavish holidays or anything like that," grazier Jono Rich said.
The taskforce will continue its tour of regional Queensland and report back to the State Treasurer in about two months.

Russia Moves To Set Own Price of Oil


Video: Bernie Sanders Decries Lack of Wall Street Prosecutions


Former financial regulator Bill Black says it’s important to reimplement the Glass-Steagall Act – but it’s not enough to prevent another financial crisis.

Via Youtube

The 'Real' Price Of Oil Is Below $17

"You see a big destruction in the income of the oil and commodity producers," exclaims on analyst but, as Bloomberg notes, while oil prices flashing across traders' terminals are at the lowest in a decade, in real terms the collapse is considerably deeper. Adjusted for inflation, WTI is its lowest since 2002 and worse still Saudi Light Crude is trading at below $17 (in 1998 dollar terms) - the lowest since the 1980s...
Slumping prices are a critical signal that the boom in lending in China is “unwinding,” according to Adair Turner, chairman of the Institute for New Economic Thinking.
In fact, while sub-$30 per barrel oil sounds very scary, Saudi prices would be less than $17 a barrel when converted into dollar levels for 1998, the year oil sank to its lowest since the 1980s.


Slowing investment and construction in China, the world’s biggest energy user, is “sending an enormous deflationary impetus through to the world, and that is a significant part of what’s happening in this oil-price collapse,” Turner, former chairman of the U.K. Financial Services Authority, said in an interview with Bloomberg Television.
*  *  *
So while prices are very low any description, never forget about inflation - The Fed won't!

Sacked ANZ trader says bank tolerated drugs, strip clubs

Sacked ANZ traders say bank tolerated drugs, strip clubs

Two traders sacked by ANZ for inappropriate behaviour are suing the bank for tens of millions of dollars, claiming a rampant culture of sex, drugs and alcohol was condoned among senior staff on the dealing floor.
Two traders sacked by ANZ Banking Group for inappropriate behaviour are suing the bank for tens of millions of dollars, claiming a rampant culture of sex, drugs and alcohol was condoned among senior staff on the dealing floor.
Mr O'Connor and Mr Alexiou's claims are difficult to read for all of us at ANZ 
ANZ's chief risk officer, Nigel Williams
"What a waste, it should have been sprinkled on a birthday cake," a senior ANZ markets trader said after a "white substance" was found in the male toilet of the bank's dealing room floor, according to court documents filed by Etienne Alexiou.
ANZ is facing allegations of tolerating a culture of sex, drugs and alcohol. ANZ is facing allegations of tolerating a culture of sex, drugs and alcohol. Photo: Peter Braig
This is one of several instances cited by the sacked trader in his $30 million claim to demonstrate a toxic culture within the senior ranks of the Global Markets division, including inebriated senior traders damaging property at a Hunter Valley retreat.
Advertisement
In a potentially more serious claim, Mr Alexiou said he formally raised concerns about the conduct of the bank towards investors and clients on three separate occasions, according to his court statement. One instance included a potential breach of the Corporations Act.
Mr Alexiou, who Fairfax Media named in January last year as one of seven traders stood down by the bank in November 2014 as a result of a regulatory probe into setting on the bank bill swap rate, was sacked for lewd and explicit communications via Bloomberg terminals.
Etienne Alexiou at his house in the eastern suburbs of Sydney. Etienne Alexiou at his house in the eastern suburbs of Sydney.

Culture not a match for standards required

The culture on the dealing floor, Mr Alexiou claimed, was at odds with the official levels of conduct demanded by the bank.
In a separate claim, a senior bond salesman, Patrick O'Connor, is suing the bank after he was fired for running up $37,000 of expenses including his rent, healthcare payments, an $18,000 purchase of rare coins and several charges at hotels in Sydney and Hong Kong.
The sackings come amid several other key departures at the bank. In December last year, ANZ's head of markets, Steve Bellotti, left the bank. There have been other departures since.
Ahead of the claims being lodged in the Federal Court, Fairfax Media became aware of an out-of-control culture on ANZ's trading floor that had raised concerns within the bank and externally.
Eddie Listorti, the new acting head of global markets, signed the termination letters of both traders, Mr Alexiou and Mr O'Connor, and was cited at least three times by Mr Alexiou as acting inconsistently with ANZ's code of conduct.
Mr Alexiou and Mr O'Connor are separately suing the bank in the Federal Court for tens of millions of dollars of damages, lost bonuses and income after they were dismissed for inappropriate or offensive electronic communication and, in Mr O'Connor's case, the abuse of a company-issued credit card.
ANZ said on Thursday that the staff were dismissed for serious breaches of its code and it would "be vigorously defending both their court applications".
"Mr O'Connor and Mr Alexiou's claims are difficult to read for all of us at ANZ but common sense says their behaviours are not consistent with our code of conduct and cannot be tolerated," ANZ's chief risk officer, Nigel Williams, said.
Mr Williams said ANZ had "already identified that many of the allegations made in both claims are not accurate and these inaccuracies will become apparent as the matters proceed through the court system".
He said ANZ would investigate allegations made about existing and former staff "that are bought to our attention either through our own management and monitoring or those raised by current or former staff".
Michael Harmer, the lawyer who represented Kristy Fraser-Kirk in her sexual harassment case against David Jones' former chief executive Mark McInnes, is acting for Mr O'Connor. Mr Alexiou's legal representative is Peter Punch of Caroll & O'Dea lawyers.
 

$30m claim

Mr Alexiou's $30 million claim is to cover deferred shares and bonuses and the loss of future income as a result of his sacking.
He was promoted by ANZ to head of balance sheet trading in March 2013 and was one of seven traders stood down as part of the bank bill swap rate (BBSW) investigation on November 19 in 2014, just seven days after he was awarded a $5 million performance bonus.
He was fired by the bank last September. The reason cited was the use of "highly offensive and inappropriate" language in emails and Bloomberg chat. The chats included disparaging comments to women and references to strip clubs and drugs, according to ANZ's termination letter submitted to the Fair Work Commission.
In total, there were 400 internal and external communications of concern from 2011 until September 2013, according to the termination letter.
While Mr Alexiou was among the traders investigated by the bank and the corporate regulator in relation to the bank bill swap rate, the bank confirmed his termination was a separate matter in the letter.
Mr Alexiou claims he was unfairly treated by the bank and questioned why he had not been reinstated while there were no findings of wrongdoing on his part, while a disciplinary investigation that led to his sacking was launched when there was "no proper reason to do so".
Mr Alexiou said he was told by another senior trader that he was unfortunately just "someone that had to be made out to be a big white dildo" in February 2014 after he was "stood down" as part of the BBSW investigation.

Unethical conduct concerns

In his statement, Mr Alexiou said he had raised concerns about unethical conduct towards bank clients on more than one occasion. He claimed that he was "exposed to a culture" at ANZ that "openly condoned" behaviour that was inconsistent with its code of conduct, values and policies.
Mr Alexiou was paid around $3.7 million to join the bank in 2011 as compensation for forgone bonus and share incentives from his previous employer, Barclays. He received bonuses of $11.3 million from 2012 to 2014 in cash and deferred shares. He is claiming $8.5 million in withheld payments and $21 million in past and future income losses. Mr Alexiou's $7.2 million Point Piper mansion was put up for sale in November 2015.
In a lengthy termination letter, Mr Listorti rejected Mr Alexiou's defence of his actions that the actual or "living" code of behaviour was at odds with the official code, and said as a "highly remunerated" senior executive, Mr Alexiou was responsible for setting the culture.
He considered, but dismissed, Mr Alexiou's argument that his health and stress should grant him leeway, while also rejecting that misspelt swear words, such as "k-k", "peniss" and "fark" were acceptable because they were not screened by the bank's surveillance systems.
Mr Alexiou claimed in his court filing that Mr Listorti had repeatedly used profanities, the most recent being an apparent threat in March 2014, when he told Mr Alexiou: "Either HR, market risk or f---ing fired. Which one is it?" according to Mr Alexiou's legal statement.

Separate claim

In a separate claim, Mr O'Connor, who was dismissed by ANZ in October 2015, is taking legal action against the bank. He demands that either his job be reinstated, damages be paid in addition to his 2015 bonus of $800,000 and reinstatement of his unvested shares, or he be compensated for his bonuses, shares, expenses, damages and the loss of future income.
Mr O'Connor, who had worked for the bank for 10 years as a senior fixed income salesman, was sacked for running up expenses on his corporate credit card of $37,000 over a one-year period, including an $18,000 purchase of rare coins, a $7468 rent payment to LJ Hooker and a $1478 health insurance payment. He made a $2740 payment for alcohol to a company called "Loke" and made three payments totalling $4000 to various Sydney hotels.
The bank mentioned seven instances of lewd and sexually explicit comments about "gang bangs" and having girls eat sushi off him while naked made by Mr O'Connor via his Bloomberg chat terminal.
Mr O'Connor claims ANZ "created, supported and encouraged" the "toxic and unsafe culture".
He claimed in his application that he suffered depression and hyperthymia, or extreme overactivity, and said ANZ had "selectively and disproportionately" subjected him to "investigation, suspension and termination" without attempting to "modify his behaviour".
This behaviour was "required" by ANZ's culture, and, as a result of his disabilities, he "could not effectively control himself".
Mr Williams said the bank understood that the claims have been made at a time of "community concern about behaviours in some financial markets businesses around the world" and as the bank was itself being investigated for potentially manipulating the bank bill swap rate.
But he said the 1000 staff in its Global Markets division continued to work hard for customers in a responsible manner and that the bank would "take the appropriate action to support and build its reputation for corporate responsibility".
To read the full story on the AFR's website here: Inside ANZ's toxic culture
First published on The Australian Financial Review.

GERALD CELENTE JUST DESTROYED OBAMA'S STATE OF THE UNION ADDRESS WITH TH...

The Last Silver Empire? Like the Roman Empire, The United States has paid for its welfare/warfare state by debasing its currency.

by Smaulgld

The decline and fall of the Roman Empire occurred over centuries, how long will U.S. Empire last?

In the “Decline and Fall of the World’s First Silver Empire” we noted that the Roman Empire’s welfare/ warfare state was funded by the denarius, which was first minted of90-98% silver. Over the years of decline of the Roman Empire, the silver content of the denarius also declined.
silver content of the roman denarius 15 bc to 272 ad

The decline in the Roman Empire corresponded with the decline in the silver content of the Roman Denarius.

The United States welfare/warfare empire is funded by the U.S. Dollar. The U.S. Dollar was once backed by gold and silver. The U.S. empire came into existence after World War II (WW II). While the United States was an industrial power prior to World War II, it was the United Kingdom (itself a silver empire) that ruled the seas and the world.
The Gold Backed Dollar Becomes the World’s Reserve Currency in 1944
The American Empire began after WW II when the U.S. emerged as the world’s sole superpower. In 1944 delegates from forty four countries met at Bretton Woods, New Hampshire and decided that the world’s reserve currency would be the U.S. dollar which would be redeemable in gold by other central banks.
mount washington hotel bretton woods new hampshire

The Mount Washington Hotel in Bretton Woods where the U.S. dollar became the world’s reserve currency.

At the time of the Bretton Woods agreement, U.S. dimes, quarters and half dollars were minted with 90% silver. This was not remarkable as most countries, France, Britain, Mexico and Canada to name a few, had silver coins circulating freely among their populations until the mid and late 1960’s.
Total Spending!
After WW II, the United State began to engage in overseas “development”. One of the first projects was the Marshall Plan (1948-1951) under which the U.S. spent over $13 billion (over $100 billion in today’s dollars) to help rebuild western Europe. A military treaty with the European recipients of the Marshall Plan largess, the North Atlantic Treaty (NATO) followed in 1949 to fight the “Cold War” with former U.S. World War II ally, the U.S.S.R. who had annexed most of eastern Europe at the end of WW II.
At the end of WW II, with much of Europe and Asia in ruins the U.S. was the industrial powerhouse of the world and viewed its mission to combat communism across the globe and as the world’s richest nation, to eradicate the embarassment of the poverty of millions of its citizens.
Presidents Kennedy and Johnson Call for Building the Welfare/Warfare State
In John F. Kennedy’s inaugural address on January 20, 1961, he pledged boldly “Let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill, that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe to assure the survival and the success of liberty.”
Lyndon Johnson declared a “War on Poverty” in his State of the Union address of January 8, 1964. Four months later, Johnson outlined his plan to build a “Great Society”; one that would involved spending heavily on education and welfare.
In order to attain the goals of being the leader of the “free” world able to “pay any price, bear any burden” AND to eradicate poverty, the U.S. established and began to grow a massive welfare/warfare state.
In the early and mid sixties the U.S. was on top of the world. The vast majority of its citizens had attained a living standard unparalleled any where in the world and it had the most powerful military on earth.
And its coinage was 90% silver.
To achieve the visions laid out by Presidents Kennedy and Johnson the spending began in earnest, accelerated and continues to this day.
Coins and Paper Currency of the United States
At the time of the inaugurations of Presidents Kennedy and Johnson, U.S. dimes, quarters and half dollars were made of silver and per the Bretton Woods Agreements, the U.S. dollar was backed by gold.
Article 1 Section 10 of the U.S. Constitution provides No state shall “make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts”
Silver in U.S. Coins/Silver Certificates
U.S. Silver Coinage (1794-1964)
xxxx

Silver coins like these rattled in the pockets of Americans in the early 1960’s.

The first United State silver dollars from 1794-1840 were made of 89.24% silver and 10.76% copper. Starting in 1840, silver dollars were made of 90% silver and 10% copperuntil the final mintage of the Peace Dollar in 1935.
U.S. dimes, quarters and half dollars were also first minted in the late 1700’s of 89.24% silver and 10.76% copper. Starting in 1836, (quarters and half dollars) and 1837 (dimes), U.S. dimes quarters and half dollars were minted of 90% silver and 10% copper. Dimes, quarters and half dollars were minted of 90% silver until mid 1965 (and dated 1964).
During World War II nicklels, were minted of 35% silver from 1942-45.
In the period of the United States “silver era” (1794-1965), the U.S. had so much silver that in 1918 it was able to melt down 270 million U.S. silver dollars to help the UK allievate a silver shortage and to support the U.S. silver mining industry.
Morgan Silver Dollar 1886

Two hundred and seventy million Morgan Silver Dollars were melted in 1918 by the U.S. government.

In 1964 the U.S. Mint produced approximately four billion silver dimes, quarters and half dollars for everyday use using about 550 million ounces of silver in the process.
550 million ounces of silver used in minting US coins in 1964

The U.S. Mint produced nearly four billion dimes, quarters and half dollars dated 1964.

U.S. Silver Certificates (1878-1968)
U.S. silver certificates were first issued in the United States under the Bland Allison Act of 1878 that also authorized the minting of Morgan Silver Dollars Silver certificates entitled the holder to redeem them at U.S. Banks for silver dollars.
$5 US silver certificate dated 1953

Silver Certificates were U.S. legal tender and entitled the holder to redeem them for their face value in silver.

The Beginning of the End of Silver Coinage and Silver Certificates in America
John Kennedy broke with a long Democratic Party tradition that supported inflationary policies and favored silver and silver mining interests, by his public shunning of silver. In John Kennedy’s Annual Message to the Congress January 21, 1963, he made a call to remove silver from the U.S. monetary system.
“I again urge a revision in our silver policy to reflect the status of silver as a metal for which there is an expanding industrial demand. Except for its use in coins, silver serves no useful monetary function. (emphasis added)
In 1961, at my direction, sales of silver were suspended by the Secretary of the Treasury. As further steps, I recommend repeal of those Acts that oblige the Treasury to support the price of silver; and repeal of the special 50-percent tax on transfers of interest in silver and authorization for the Federal Reserve System to issue notes in denominations of $1, so as to make possible the gradual withdrawal of silver certificates from circulation(emphasis added) and the use of the silver thus released for coinage purposes. I urge the Congress to take prompt action on these recommended changes.”
Goodbye Silver Coins and Silver Certificates
Through the efforts of John F. Kennnedy and Lyndon Johnson, the men that had urged a vast welfare/warefare state, silver was removed from the U.S. monetary system and its coins. Unlike the gradual debasement of the Roman denaius, in 1965, the U,S. eliminated just about all silver from its coinage in one year. From 1965-1970 the U.S. Mint produced40% silver half dollars.
Pursuant to the Act of June 4, 1963 (31 U.S.C. 405a-1) U.S. Treasury C. Douglas Dillon announced in March 1964 the end of redemption of silver certificates to coincide with the cessation of mintage of silver coinage at the end of that year (silver coins dated 1964 were minted well into 1965 at the U.S. Mint). The Act allowed the exchange of silver certificates for silver bullion until June 24, 1968.
In 1965, with silver out of the picture, the United States massively increased it participation in Vietnam (warfare) sending hundreds of thousands of troops to south east Asia and launched the War on Poverty and the Great Society (welfare).
Silver remained out of U.S. coinage until 1981 when the U.S. Mint minted 2.2 million silver half dollars commemorating the 250th Anniversary of George Washington’s birth. These commemoratives, while legal tender were intended for collectors only and not generally circulated.
In 1986, the U.S. Mint began selling 99% American Eagle coins to the public. Since 1986 the U.S. Mint has sold about 450 million silver eagle coins.
American Silver Eagle sales 1986-2015

The U.S. Mint has sold about 450 million American Silver Eagle coins since 1986.

The amount of silver required to produce twenty nine years worth of American Silver Eagle coins to sell to the public (about 450 million ounces) is still less than the amount of silver the U.S. Mint used to produce 1964 dated dimes, quarters and half dollars.
chart showing amount of silver used to mint silver eagles from 1986-2015 vs silver used to mint 1964 dated coins

The U.S. Mint used nearly 550 million ounces of silver in 1964 to mint coins for everyday use.

Removing Gold From The U.S. Monetary System
Starting 1795, the U.S. began minting $10 (“Eagles) and $5 (“Half Eagles”)coins made of 91.67% gold and 8.33% silver and copper. By 1849, the composition of Eagles and Half Eagles had switched to 90% gold and 10% copper and $2.50 (Quarter Eagles) and $20 (Double Eagles) face value coins had been introduced with the same composition.
On April 5, 1933 President Franklin Roosevelt issued executive order 6102, that among other things, removed all U.S. gold coins from circulation. For more information on this order see “Think Fed Destroyed the Dollar
On August 15, 1971, Richard Nixon, unilaterally informed the world that the United States would no longer honor the provisions of the Bretton Wood Agreements that allowed foreign central banks to redeem their dollars for gold held at the U.S. Treasury.
From that date forward United States currency would have neither the backing of gold nor silver.
And the spending continued and increased on welfare and wars.
A debased currency was not enough, however, to support the United States’ welfare/warefare state and massive deficit spending made possible by issuing Treasury securities, first domestically and then increasingly to foreigners was needed to fuel U.S. government spending.
Chines holdings of US Treasury bonds

China holds over $1.2 trillion in U.S. debt obligations.

Federal Debt Total – A Century of Red Ink

The chart below illustrates the ballooning of U.S. deficit spending:
u.s. deficit spending

U.S. deficit spending is approaching $20 trillion.

The U.S. deficit does not include any U.S. agency debt of Government Sponsored Agencies like Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Sally Mae or costs associated with Social Security and Medicare. Estimates for these expenditures range from $100 -$200 trillion.
In addition to the Federal government debt loads, U.S. state also have significant debt outstanding. According to Usgovernmentdebt.com the state government debt in the United States is expected to be $1.184 trillion at the end of 2016.

Where the Welfare/Warfare Money is Spent

See below for a list of wars and the new programs and Federal agencies created since the U.S. removed silver from its coinage and gold backing from the dollar.
U.S. Mint Examines Ways to Further Debase its Coinage
In 2014, the U.S. Congress, not content to be producing coins from base metals instead of silver, commissioned the U.S. Mint to study even cheaper alternatives to copper and nickel to mint, nickels, dimes and quarters.
Next up “The Decline and Fall Of the First Gold EmpireSubscribe below to get this post as soon as it is published.
Also see “The Decline and Fall of the World’s First Silver Empire

Treasury Department confirms President Obama has fully turned around the U.S. economy



President Obama’s seven year quest to salvage the U.S. economy from the damage done to it by his predecessor George W. Bush has been an overwhelming success, according to the United States Treasury Department. Obama took over as President at a time when the economy, stock market and banking system had collapsed and were on the verge of throwing the nation into a depression due to Bush’s failed policies. But Obama’s initiatives prevented that from happening, and now the Treasury says he’s fully turned the economy around.
Treasury Secretary Jack Lew has confirmed what economists and those familiar with economic policy have already known: the U.S. economy has been growing at a steady rate for several quarters, private sector job growth is consistently high, the unemployment rate has been reduced all the way down to the five percent level which economists view as ideal, and the stock market has grown tremendously. This all occurred even as President Obama reduced the annual federal deficit by seventy-two percent. But the Secretary says there are still challenges ahead.
Lew points to the inequality between the wealthy and the working class, and business tax loopholes, as areas of concern; Obama has tried to tackle both but has faced republican opposition. But he says Social Security is in far better shape than most Americans believe. The Hill has more from the Treasury Secretary.

The United States and the European Union are expected to formally lift sanctions against Iran this weekend.

The world powers and Iran last summer struck a landmark nuclear deal, in which Tehran agreed to curb its nuclear program in exchange for the lifting of international sanctions.
Now, Iran is poised to finally feel the effects of the accord, including an end to the EU embargo of Iranian oil imports and reestablished ties between Iranian banks and the European financial system.
According to Abbas Araqchi, Iran’s deputy foreign minister and senior nuclear negotiator, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) on Friday will verify that Tehran has fulfilled all its obligations under the agreement, including unplugging thousands of centrifuges and significantly reducing its stockpile of low-enriched uranium, the Guardian reported.
That report by the IAEA will trigger the announcement of an “implementation day,” when the lifting of US and EU sanctions will come into effect and all previous nuclear-related UN resolutions will be terminated. Tehran expects this to happen Saturday or Sunday.
“The IAEA inspectors are supposed to issue their final report on Iran’s honoring of its commitments on Friday,” Araghchi was quoted by local news agencies as saying.
US Secretary of State John Kerry, speaking in Washington, said the nuclear deal is likely to be implemented in the coming days.
“As agreed, Iran is now well on its way to dismantling critical elements of its nuclear facilities,” Kerry said. “Just yesterday, the foreign minister reported to me that the calandria of the plutonium nuclear reactor is now out and in the next hours it will be filled with concrete and destroyed.”
“We will ensure that the spectre of a nuclear armed Iran is removed as a threat to Middle East security and global peace, and it is not insignificant that Iran has agreed to submit to this, agreed to undertake these steps, agreed that it will not build this weapon,” he added.
Non-nuclear related US sanctions on Iran, such as those relating to terrorism, will remain in place.

Obama Is A Joke. He Will Go Down In History As One Of The Worst Presidents In History.

by James Quinn

The Liar-in-Chief evidently crowed last night about his awesome achievements in turning our economy around, generating millions of jobs, and cutting our deficits. The average American knows he’s full of shit and lying his half black ass off. The economy is in recession and has been in recession for the average person (not Wall Street bankers and DC politicians) for years.
His Obamacare debacle is destroying the finances of middle class families and small businesses. The jobs added are part-time shit jobs for people who got laid off from good paying full-time jobs because of Obamacare. Deficits have been artificially cut through accounting schemes with Fannie, Freddie, and the Fed. They are poised to soar back to $1 trillion per year because Obama has done nothing but add to our unfunded welfare liabilities.
Obama fancies himself as the champion of the poor and working class. The chart below reveals the true state of Obama’s union. Real median income in 2007 before the Wall Street created financial collapse was $57,300. Today it is $53,800. Any idiot who considers that progress should be a community organizer. The Liar-in-Chief took office in 2009 when the poverty rate was 14.5%. He’s going to leave office with the poverty rate exceeding 15.5%. His black poverty stricken constituency should be stringing him up, based on his success in alleviating their pain.
Obama is a joke. He will go down in history as one of the worst presidents in history, and that is hard to do.

Russia And China Are Preparing To Decouple From The US Dollar.


Obama during the SOTU reported that the economy is in perfect shape and anyone that doubts this is peddling fiction. Overdraft fees on peoples account are rising. Many financial analysts are reporting that the stock market is in a bear market and will most likely decline more than 25%. The BDI has fallen to an all time new low. Russia and China are preparing to decouple from the US dollar. Russia is setting up its own oil trading system which will allow the country to deal with other countries bypassing the dollar.

Setting the Record Straight: Did Monsanto Really Buy Blackwater (Xe)?

There has been a great deal of publicity over the potential purchase of Blackwater (now known as Academi, and Xe before that) by mega corporation Monsanto. While the two seem to be a great match, as they both fail to consider the morality and consequence of their actions, it seems that Monsanto is only involved with Blackwater in infiltrating activist groups who are opposed to the biotech giant — an operation quite sinister enough. The truth of the matter is that Academi (Blackwater) was purchased by private investors, and the heavily sourced article written by Jeremy Scahill in The Nation actually says nothing about Monsanto buying Blackwater.
What the articles does say, however, is that Monsanto and Blackwater are indeed working together to target anti-Monsanto activists and organizations. Known as far back as 2010, it was unveiled that Blackwater’s client list included Monsanto, Chevron, Walt Disney and many more. According to documents obtained by Scahill, it was also revealed that Monsanto was willing to pay upwards of $500,000 in order for Blackwater to join anti-Monsanto activist groups and infiltrate the ranks. Furthermore, a number of internet-based tactics could be utilized as incognito PR for Monsanto, who undoubtedly knew opposition would mount against their GMO crops as more individuals became aware of the dangers.
Amazingly, the document stated that Monsanto was “concerned about animal rights activists and that they discussed how Blackwater “could have our person(s) actually join [activist] group(s) legally.”
Of course this occurred back in 2008, and Monsanto admitted in e-mails that the relationship lasted until around 2010 — near the time the information came to light. Raw Story reports:
“In an… e-mail to The Nation, Wilson confirmed he met Black in Zurich and that Monsanto hired Total Intelligence in 2008 and worked with the company until early 2010. “
Even though Monsanto may not have purchased Blackwater, their relationship with them remains quite clear. Both organizations are noted for their crimes against humanity, and they really do have a twisted synergy of sorts so it is quite easy to see how the topic became viral. While they may not be owned by the same individuals, one thing is clear: the relationship between these two companies is enough cause for alarm.

Princeton Study Says U.S. No Longer An Actual Democracy

Source: Counter Current News

police-state-oligarchy
A groundbreaking study from Princeton University is causing a lot of controversy, but its findings are undeniable.
The university study explain that U.S. democracy is pure fiction. That is, the researchers explain, it simply does not exist.
The scholars behind the study asked the question: “[w]ho really rules?”
Researchers Martin Gilens along with Benjamin I. Page concluded that over the past few decades in particular, the U.S. political system has gradually changed in a way that has warped the Democratic Republic into a nearly pure oligarchy, where the elite 1% rule with almost total influence and control over the government and even police state apparatus.
The researchers drew data from over 1,800 different policy initiatives dating from 1981 to 2002. They concluded that wealthy, well-connected families are the ones who steer the direction of nearly everything politically in the United States.
“The central point that emerges from our research is that economic elites and organized groups representing business interests have substantial independent impacts on U.S. government policy,” they explain, “while mass-based interest groups and average citizens have little or no independent influence.”
Gilens and Page compare and contrast the political preferences of those at the 50th income percentile to preferences of those at the 90th percentile in addition to major lobbying or business groups.
The pair found that regardless of whether one is Republican or Democratic was of no significant difference. The results showed that more often than not, policy followed the interests of corporations and the 1%.
The research notes recent Supreme Court decisions that allow more money in politics – pointing to this as a likely factor in this transformation into an oligarchy – stretching back to the 1980s.
“Ordinary citizens,” they explain, “might often be observed to ‘win’ (that is, to get their preferred policy outcomes) even if they had no independent effect whatsoever on policy making, if elites (with whom they often agree) actually prevail.”


Ian McAvity: We’ve now completed a topping in the stock market; Gold is currently bottoming, a prelude to a major rise


The Trump phenomenon: Main street’s anger with the establishment
We’ve now completed a topping in the stock market
Gold is currently bottoming, a prelude to a major rise

Fed Insolvent, Dollar Will Collapse 90% or More-James Rickards


James Rickards Photo 4 (2)By Greg Hunter’s USAWatchdog.com   (Early Sunday Release)
Financial expert and best-selling author James Rickards thinks the “international monetary system is headed for a collapse.”  Rickards contends, “It’s really not meant to be a provocative statement.  The international monetary system actually has collapsed three times in the past 100 years.  It collapsed in 1914.  It collapsed in 1939, and it collapsed in 1971.  When it happens, it doesn’t mean the end of the world or we all go live in caves.  We have a period of sort of economic confusion.”  Rickards new book “The Death of Money” is a road map for what is coming.  Rickards contends, “What I do for the reader is explain why the collapse is coming and, secondly, describe what this new system might look like.  That should be very helpful to investors in preparing to both survive the collapse and be well positioned in terms of wealth preservation under the new system that’s coming.” 
What does the new system look like for the U.S. dollar?  Rickards says, “Here we are, again, looking at another collapse.  The problem today is we are on a global dollar standard.  A paper money standard can work, but only if you maintain confidence in the money . . . and you do that by running a good economy and having a good business environment . . . we’re doing the opposite.  We are printing a lot of money.  We have a lousy business environment.  Taxes are too high.  Growth is too low.  So, a lot of things are combining to undermine confidence in the dollar.  Rickards goes on to say, “The last time the system collapsed in 2008, the Fed rescued it.  How did they do that?  Well, we know the Fed printed over $3.5 trillion in new money in the last 5 years.  The Fed’s balance sheet went from $800 billion to over $4 trillion.  People understand that.  What’s less well known is the swap lines with Europe . . . European banks had dollar liabilities because they borrowed money in dollars. . . .   Where did the European Central Bank get the dollars they needed to bail out their own banks?  They got them from the Fed.  They gave us euros and we gave them dollars.  So, these dollar/euro swaps were in the tens of trillions of dollars. . . . In addition to that, the Fed guaranteed every money market fund in the United States . . . and they guaranteed every bank deposit in the United States.  Here you have a massive $60-$100 trillion bailout, not the $4 trillion you were told.  Fast forward to today. When the next collapse comes, it is going to be bigger than the last one.  It’s going to be exponentially bigger. The five biggest banks that were too big to fail in 2008, today they are bigger.  They own a larger percentage of the total banking assets. . . . When you double or triple the scale of the system, you don’t double or triple the risk.  You increase the risk by an exponent that could be 10 times or 100 times.” 
On the Fed engineering another 2008 type bailout, Rickards claims, “The last crisis was barely enough for the Fed to contain.  They have used up all their dry powder.  They can’t take the balance sheet any higher.  They are already insolvent. . . . The Fed is insolvent.  If you mark their assets to market, they are leveraged 80 to 1, and interest rates have been going up.  So, a very small decline in the market value of their assets and it wipes out their capital.  It’s a very simple math.  So, we have an insolvent central bank.  The next crisis is going to be bigger.  You can see it coming.  It is going to be too big for the Fed.  They have taken their balance sheet to $4 trillion.  What are they going to do, take their balance sheet to $8 trillion and leverage 200 to 1?  The game is up.  This has become very apparent.  They are insolvent on a mark to market basis today, not like next year or the year after.  They are insolvent today.”
Rickards foresees big inflation because the U.S. dollar’s buying power will shrink.  Rickards predicts, “Imagine gas at $20 a gallon and bread at $10.  That’s what we’re talking about.”  So, if big inflation is coming, what about gold?  Rickards says, “When I say the price of gold is going to $7,000 or $9,000 per ounce, which I expect it will, what I am really saying is the dollar is going to collapse 80% or 90% or more.”  It did in the 1970’s.  None of this is unprecedented, it all happened before.” 
Rickards says, “When a collapse happens, it will happen quickly.  You won’t see it coming.  There won’t be time to run out and buy gold, and it probably will not even be available at that stage.  You need to prepare now.” 
Join Greg Hunter as he goes One-on-One with James Rickards, author of the new book “The Death of Money.”
(There is much more in the video interview.) 



Fed Insolvent, Dollar Will Collapse 90% or More-James Rickards

James Rickards Photo 4 (2)By Greg Hunter’s USAWatchdog.com   (Early Sunday Release)
Financial expert and best-selling author James Rickards thinks the “international monetary system is headed for a collapse.”  Rickards contends, “It’s really not meant to be a provocative statement.  The international monetary system actually has collapsed three times in the past 100 years.  It collapsed in 1914.  It collapsed in 1939, and it collapsed in 1971.  When it happens, it doesn’t mean the end of the world or we all go live in caves.  We have a period of sort of economic confusion.”  Rickards new book “The Death of Money” is a road map for what is coming.  Rickards contends, “What I do for the reader is explain why the collapse is coming and, secondly, describe what this new system might look like.  That should be very helpful to investors in preparing to both survive the collapse and be well positioned in terms of wealth preservation under the new system that’s coming.” 
What does the new system look like for the U.S. dollar?  Rickards says, “Here we are, again, looking at another collapse.  The problem today is we are on a global dollar standard.  A paper money standard can work, but only if you maintain confidence in the money . . . and you do that by running a good economy and having a good business environment . . . we’re doing the opposite.  We are printing a lot of money.  We have a lousy business environment.  Taxes are too high.  Growth is too low.  So, a lot of things are combining to undermine confidence in the dollar.  Rickards goes on to say, “The last time the system collapsed in 2008, the Fed rescued it.  How did they do that?  Well, we know the Fed printed over $3.5 trillion in new money in the last 5 years.  The Fed’s balance sheet went from $800 billion to over $4 trillion.  People understand that.  What’s less well known is the swap lines with Europe . . . European banks had dollar liabilities because they borrowed money in dollars. . . .   Where did the European Central Bank get the dollars they needed to bail out their own banks?  They got them from the Fed.  They gave us euros and we gave them dollars.  So, these dollar/euro swaps were in the tens of trillions of dollars. . . . In addition to that, the Fed guaranteed every money market fund in the United States . . . and they guaranteed every bank deposit in the United States.  Here you have a massive $60-$100 trillion bailout, not the $4 trillion you were told.  Fast forward to today. When the next collapse comes, it is going to be bigger than the last one.  It’s going to be exponentially bigger. The five biggest banks that were too big to fail in 2008, today they are bigger.  They own a larger percentage of the total banking assets. . . . When you double or triple the scale of the system, you don’t double or triple the risk.  You increase the risk by an exponent that could be 10 times or 100 times.” 
On the Fed engineering another 2008 type bailout, Rickards claims, “The last crisis was barely enough for the Fed to contain.  They have used up all their dry powder.  They can’t take the balance sheet any higher.  They are already insolvent. . . . The Fed is insolvent.  If you mark their assets to market, they are leveraged 80 to 1, and interest rates have been going up.  So, a very small decline in the market value of their assets and it wipes out their capital.  It’s a very simple math.  So, we have an insolvent central bank.  The next crisis is going to be bigger.  You can see it coming.  It is going to be too big for the Fed.  They have taken their balance sheet to $4 trillion.  What are they going to do, take their balance sheet to $8 trillion and leverage 200 to 1?  The game is up.  This has become very apparent.  They are insolvent on a mark to market basis today, not like next year or the year after.  They are insolvent today.”
Rickards foresees big inflation because the U.S. dollar’s buying power will shrink.  Rickards predicts, “Imagine gas at $20 a gallon and bread at $10.  That’s what we’re talking about.”  So, if big inflation is coming, what about gold?  Rickards says, “When I say the price of gold is going to $7,000 or $9,000 per ounce, which I expect it will, what I am really saying is the dollar is going to collapse 80% or 90% or more.”  It did in the 1970’s.  None of this is unprecedented, it all happened before.” 
Rickards says, “When a collapse happens, it will happen quickly.  You won’t see it coming.  There won’t be time to run out and buy gold, and it probably will not even be available at that stage.  You need to prepare now.” 
Join Greg Hunter as he goes One-on-One with James Rickards, author of the new book “The Death of Money.”
(There is much more in the video interview.) 

After the interview:
Rickards told me he is already starting to sketch out his next book.  He did not tell me the subject, but I suspect it will talk (in part) about the post-dollar reserve currency world.  He says that project is at least 2 years away.  In the meantime, you can order his new book “The Death of Money” by clicking this link.